User talk:Starscream

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
pl
en-1

Gdynia

[edit]

Hej! Co do języka - takie tam, jak na razie wszystko w wersji ewoluującej, ważniejsze jest dla mnie kategoryzowanie niż nazywanie.

A co do Gdyni. Widzę, że bywasz. Może potrzaskasz trochę fotek tabliczkom z nazwami ulic? Z góry dzięki.

Pozdrawiam serdecznie M.A. aka Joymaster


Spoko, jak zawsze, widzę, mamy inne podejście. Póki co opisy sa ok, może i śmieszne ale są odpowiednie. Potem puści się bota. Pozdrawiam Gwiezdnykrzyku :)

Durnoty do kasowania

[edit]

File:ITB Tom Wilkinson & Sissy Spacek Photograph by Todd Field.jpg Sissy Spacek i Tom Wilkinson w filmie Za drzwiami sypialni. Wątpie by ten użytkownik miał prawa autorskie do tego pliku.
File:Kate Winslet @ Oscars.jpg Kate Winslet podczas 81. ceremowi wręczenia Oscarów. Dno w opisie, na Flickru jakaś strona fanowska z wszystkim związanym z Kate, wątpie czy to jego zdjęcie.

ron_whisky 09:59, 02 lip 2009

Gdańsk

[edit]

Gdzieś na Oliwie ale ja Gdańska nie znam o nie lubię...

Tamara Arciuch

[edit]

U aktorek jest niezwykle zmienne, w ogóle u kobiet ;). Kategoria może się tyczyć tylko do jednego zdjęcia, a nie do całości ;D

ron_whisky, 21:23 28 Nov 2009

Category:Mariusz Pudzianowski

[edit]

Witaj. Pudzian figuruje już w tej kategorii i umieszczanie go w kategorii Strongman jest zbędne. Na początku wprowadzono małe błędy tworząc nowe kategorie. Teraz ułożyłem cały dział w porządku nstp. Kategoria nadrzędna dla całego działu: Category:Strongmen, w niej jest wszystko, co dotyczy sportu strongman. Poniżej kategorie dla zawodników wg krajów, czyli np.: Category:Strength athletes from Poland (prawidłowo siłacz w jęz. ang., to: a strength athlete), poniżej są kategorie osobiste zawodnikó, w tym Category:Mariusz Pudzianowski. Category:Strongman pochodzi z dawnych czasów i tak naprawdę jest zbędna ale wrzuciłem tam (aby nie była pusta) "archaizmy", czyli nie sportowców, a cyrkowców.

Artur

Czarny czwartek

[edit]

No niestety, nie kojarzę tej pani. Być może to jest jakaś statystka ? Jak na razie nie mogę ci pomóc, ale będę monitorować sytuacje ;D

ron_whisky 16:47, 15 mar 2010 (CET)

To Paweł Chmielewski, drugi reżyser. Zdjęcie porównałem z tym na naszej-klasie ;p hee

ron_whisky 17:47, 19 mar 2010 (CET)

?

[edit]

jaki sen ma wstawienie tylu zdjęć w jednej kategorii tej samej osoby ?

Konstal 105N/10Na

[edit]

Jeśli chodzi o kategorię Konstal 105N, to w artykule podano: Pozostałe nadal istniejące i eksploatowane tramwaje typu 105N to szkoleniowy 5001...~~

File:Scotty.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Deadstar (msg) 10:42, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:'eye' of Face On Mars.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheDJ (talkcontribs) 08:24, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Office of Izabela Jaruga-Nowacka after president's plane crash 2010 - 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SmokeyTheBearHeadshot.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 19:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Derivative works of famous art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 12:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Iconic photographs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]