User talk:Nethunter

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Nethunter!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 13:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussions: * Discussion_2007-2008

Colours

[edit]

Hi Anu! Hope you're having a nice starting of 2009. I forgot to answer you about your question for some colours, done in november! Ok, I see you found solutions for some of them:

Naranja sepia: this means orange in a sepia tone, like old pictures; but as we can see in the pdf of flags of Almeria (Gádor municipality) it looks like pure orange. We can create a mix between brown and orange, but I found it not needed if it used only for one flag.

  • Azul añil: as you did for the Setenil flag (Cádiz) it means a dark blue, so B++.
  • Amarillo limón: so, lemmon yellow. Usually it is used colloquially for a bright yellow, and we could use both Y and Y--, but I would vote for the second one.
  • Rojo ocre: for this colour, I would pick our Orange, also used for simple 'ocres'. But i have thought we can create another orange (O+) not created yet, for the common 'ocre' and this 'rojo ocre'. And left orange alone.
  • Tierra: earth, so, also 'ocre'. Like the rojo ocre, I'm going to create a little dark orange, O+.
  • Verde madroño: lol, original one. As we can see in the Pdf of the Andalusia goverment, it looks simply like a dark green, so V++.
  • Violada: that means 'violet' as sure you know, but, we had problems to define violets, murrays, purples, and so. Purpure is more an heraldic tradition brought to flags, and morado has another touch. Anyway, we defined dark violet like Purpure, but not the common violet. The dictionary of the Spanish Academy says that 'violet' is a light 'morado', so we can create another colour, a morado--, namely 'violet', lighter than morado, and close also purpure and magenta (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple#Purple_versus_violet).
  • Bermejo: is a darkish red shade, so R++, like 'granate' or 'burdeos'.

Hope it helped :) I'm going to create the new shades! --HansenBCN (talk) 15:42, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I took time to answer because lately I have no much time for wikipedia :(, I finished uni few time ago, and now I work a lot, and I have few free time, hehe. Ok! let's see, for the 'ocre' i've created a new colour mixing O- with R+, and resulted colour mixed with brown (M), after other trying, i think its the best choice for an appropiate ocre (ochre). We can fit it as O+ , better as M-, not created yet. How do you see? (R=157, G=83 and B=51). If you see it fine, I will add it on the chart.
For the lemon yellow, I think you're right. After watching many lemon pics (google) I think the best colour is simply yellow. It use to mean a bright yellow, and I couldn't find any bright yellow between our colours. I think it is also because a bright colour would mean more a bright material (for the flag) than a colour itself; if you put a simply RGBish yellow (255,255,0) , it will appear very bright, but it brokes the assumption of that chart (to avoid simply web colours and choice more realistic colours for flag images) and I guess, not fits fine with other colours. Also as we said, it's just for one flag ;)
Azul Prusia is clearly a dark blue, B++ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_blue). And gris perla, I guess it would fit perfectly as a silver AG. If you compare, you will see that the silver of the chart would be also a G--, and that's fine if the flag's description says both names, gris perla or plata.
Finally, for the Violet...I'm going to explore now, say you something later :) --HansenBCN (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Following wikipedia about violet and purple, I've seen our 'morado' is very close to a propper 'violet' so I cleared a bit following the way used to clear other colours, and the morado- fits perfectly for a 'violet' (203,157,154). How do you see? --HansenBCN (talk) 16:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen you used a dark blue for the flag of Alquería de Aznar, which says 'azul turquesa', hehe, I guess you thought it was the same as 'azul turquí', because the names are very close. But 'turquesa' means 'turquoise', usually defined like a greenish blue or a blueish green. For this one I propose a new category and a mix of that primary colours, which results in R=11, B=104 and G=112. Hope it helps. About the question of 'morado', and violet, yes, that's very confusing! I'm happy to read you enjoy about creating and discusing the new shades, I think we are doing by the good way and establishing a very interesting colours system for flags :) --HansenBCN (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 15:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!! Reading the flag description of the Algorfa's flag, I notice that the text says "torre" that means tower and your creation has a castle. Regards! --Xavigivax (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anu, the year not begin very well for us, my grandfather (mother's father) passed away after very few days in emergency department cuased by a respiration problem. The rest of the year was very normal (these are good news), we enjoy the x-mas with our children and the rest of the family. Regards! --Xavigivax (talk) 23:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flags of Catalonia

[edit]

Hi Anu, the flag's descriptions of Catalonia are not in www.municat.net, there only will find a representation of the same, but without description and sometimes with errors. The descriptions are in the DOGC database [1] but you need some information, like the number of document (number of DOGC-> Diari Oficial de la Generalitat de Catalunya) or some of the DOGC's dates (publication or aprovation). You could find some of these information at the catalan version of wikipedia.

For exemple: Flag of Rubí. There you find a date: 14 de maig de 1990

Months in catalan
  1. Gener
  2. Febrer
  3. Març
  4. Abril
  5. Maig
  6. Juny
  7. Juliol
  8. Agost
  9. Setembre
  10. Octubre
  11. Novembre
  12. Desembre

I go to the DOGC's data base in spanish and click on the field "Fecha DOGC" and inform: 14.05.1990 and then click the button "buscar" that means search. The result is bellow the searh page. The result gives more than a page, for these reason, I click the button "Imprimir sumario" -> Print summary. Whit this action, I have all the results in the same page, then I find by text (with firefox pressing Ctrl+F) "bandera". Then I have the rest of the information:

30.- 	 Número DOGC: 	 1291 	 Fecha DOGC: 	 14.05.1990 	 Página DOGC: 	 1923
	 Organismo: 	DEPARTAMENTO DE GOBERNACIÓN Y RELACIONES INSTITUCIONALES/14000
	 Título documento: 	ANUNCIO relativo a la aprobación de la bandera municipal de Rubí (Vallès Occidental).

Then I know that the point 30 has the information about the flag description of Rubí. Then return to the original find page when we push the button "Imprimir sumario" and search the point number 30 and click the link. At the top of the page will appear:

...
*** El texto del documento está disponible en formato PDF 
***Imagen del documento en descarga del documento en formato PDF
...

If you click the pdf icon, you will have the page of the official document with the flag description in spanish.

If you don't find the text, try to find with the field "Fecha documento" instead of "Fecha DOGC".

I want to finish the coats of arms of Catalonia and then I will pursue the flags.

See you Anu! --Xavigivax (talk) 10:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC) P.S. I add some colors to the flag's inkscape's palette [2].[reply]

Flags of Catalonia

[edit]

Hello, if you know how to translate the description of the flags to the English language your help will be wellcome. Although I understand English my level isn't sufficient as to translate the specialized terms. Cameta (talk) 19:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Halifaxrmflag.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Svgalbertian (talk) 02:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:BEL Brussels flag.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate!

[edit]

Where are you? Are you fine? --Xavigivax (talk) 09:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mourning flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alkari (?), 24 April 2013, 07:02 UTC 07:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ESP Entrena Flag.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Altura Spain.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.159.119.114 12:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Error

[edit]

Vega_de_Liebana_Spain.svg is not the flag of Vega de Liébana. It should have only two strips, the upper one red, and the lower one, yellow. Fix it, please.--2.137.61.47 22:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theux Belgium.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Les Meloures (talk) 14:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Kortrijk.svg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Kortrijk.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Barrie.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY 05:03, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mondoñedo Spain.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estevoaei (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Madrid (city) Spain.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TucsonMager79 (talk) 21:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]