User talk:Hansmuller/Archive 2019

File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.120792 1 - Incisura lyttletonensis (Smith, 1894) - Scissurellidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg

File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.120792 1 - Incisura lyttletonensis (Smith, 1894) - Scissurellidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moin moin! The photograph doesn't contain a specimen, any objection to delete this one? Cheers! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 09:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete, this type of image is valuable for taxonomists. Experts at Naturalis (Leiden, the Netherlands) have told me this when i uploaded seemingly "empty" images of plants and here molluscs because a change in the species name is shown. (The companion image File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.120792 - Incisura lyttletonensis (Smith, 1894) - Scissurellidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg shows the minuscule specimens.) Thanks for keeping this image Hansmuller (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I left a message on the DR page. Thanks for your fast reply!

--Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File was fortunately not deleted, but moved (renamed) to File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.120792 1 - Incisura lytteltonensis (Smith, 1894) - Scissurellidae - Mollusc shell.jpg Hansmuller (talk) 05:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Idem File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.120792 - Incisura lyttletonensis (Smith, 1894) - Scissurellidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg to File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.120792 - Incisura lytteltonensis (Smith, 1894) - Scissurellidae - Mollusc shell.jpg. Hansmuller (talk) 05:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NIMH

Hallo Hans, je merkt hier op dat de foto's in de betreffende categorie, in tegenstelling tot wat de categorienaam suggereert, geen foto's van onbekende locaties zijn; het is gewoon een kwestie van op de juiste link klikken. Ik vermoed dat dat voor de meeste afbeeldingen zal opgaan, maar het NIMH heeft het ook weleens bij het verkeerde eind. Zie daarvoor dit item. Zou het een reden kunnen zijn om de tekst bij te stellen? Groet, Apdency (talk) 20:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Apdency, blijkbaar heb je het over NIMH militaire luchtfoto's, ik heb er maar een kopje boven gezet. Ik begrijp je punt niet, in de categorie die ik bedoelde zijn bij de upload gewoon de locaties die de link geeft vergeten, de locaties van die foto's zijn niet systematisch fout voor zover bekend. In het geval van Lunteren kun je corrigeren als de beschrijving fout is. Groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Dank voor dat kopje, ik was 'm simpelweg vergeten te plaatsen.) Nee, systematisch fout zijn ze niet. Ik dacht gewoon aan een wat meer genuanceerde aanduiding ('not necessarily' o.i.d.). Bij de plaatjes waarvan is vastgesteld dat de plaatsaanduiding fout is ga ik misschien nog gebruikmaken van het commentaarformulier bij de NIMH-pagina's. Apdency (talk) 20:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Apdency @DDJJ Dank voor je belangstelling, misschien kun je voor een systematische aanpak beter terecht bij de uploadster User:DDJJ (ik heb die categorie met "unknown locations" niet gemaakt want die partij luchtfoto's niet geüpload). Mooi dat foute locaties worden uitgewied, ook van belang voor de correctie van de beeldbank van NIMH. Bedankt, Hansmuller (talk) 11:55, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Apdency @DDJJ Inmiddels heb ik de foto's van 2018 met "unknown location" (Category:Aerial photographs from Nederlands Instituut voor Militaire Historie with unknown location) hun plaats volgens de databank van het NIMH meegegeven, in metadata en categorieën. (Er blijven drie luchtfoto's over met onbekende locatie.) Mochten er fouten in zitten, dan graag correctie. Bedankt (ook voor het opladen!) en vriendelijke groet, Hansmuller (talk) 06:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie des oiseaux

bonjour, Les images de la Category:Histoire des oiseaux par François-Nicolas Martinet datent de 1790-1796, période où l'identification des oiseaux n'était pas précise et a été largement revue depuis. Il est donc difficile de trouver le nom latin de chaque oiseau, sauf pour un spécialiste. Je le ferai mais seulement pour les espèces très courantes et facilement identifiable, pour les autres il faudrait qu'un spécialiste ( que je ne suis pas) le fasse. Cordialement Robert Valette (talk) 13:36, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Long page

Are you still using List of registration numbers for the images in Category:Songbird specimens at Naturalis Biodiversity Center? It has 1,420,531 bytes of wiki-code, and should be split if still needed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same with List of species and genera in Category:Mollusc specimens at Naturalis Biodiversity Center, 663,303 bytes. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing @Andy Mabbett Hi Andy, i hope you are well (we once met at a hackathon in Amsterdam where you asked me to do a Van Gogh translation for the New Art Gallery Walsall.) Yes, i think those lists are practical to have a ready handle (e.g., lookup table) on the donation of Naturalis for their curators without them having to do a query. I check species with the species list. (1,4 Mb isn't that large, is it? But then i was an astronomer.) Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 10:20, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS1 Perhaps you know whether there is a policy for the administration/tracking of such large donations. I'll add a report in English for the Naturalis project.

PS2 Files are within the limit set by Commons:Maximum file size. Some biology buffs were active (up to 2017) trying to fit in the species on the species list in the taxonomy. Hansmuller (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Module:Ahmede 220 Ahmede 220 (talk) 13:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Module===:Ahmede 220 Ahmede 220 (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Module:Ahmede 220 Ahmede 220 (talk) 13:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Ataka

Re [1] et al.

Please stop removing images from this category. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley , Excuse me, i thought i did not remove images from this category, have a look. Photographs were put illogically in double categories, that was confusing, i hope i have remedied that. Please don't put files twice in redundant categories. So please not a picture both in say cat. Photographer in Ataka AND in cat. Ataka. Wikimedians don't want that. (I experienced that previously with 275000 pictures from Naturalis, for example in Category:Mollusca specimens at Naturalis Biodiversity Center). Thank you. Hansmuller (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley , O i'm sorry, you're right, i see i made some mistakes. Thanks! Hansmuller (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Naturalis uploads

Hi, I was looking at some of the images you uploaded from the Naturalis center. I edited an image (File:RMNH.MOL.156397 Cytora pallida cropped with scale bar.jpg) to include a scale bar based on the width of the QR given as 38 mm, and I just wanted to confirm with you whether the width of the card is 38 mm, or if it is in fact the QR code that's 38 mm. Cheers, —Mike moral ♪♫ 07:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikemoral: @Mikemoral Thank you for your excellent question which i should have answered clearly right at the start on Category:Mollusca at Naturalis from the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie when uploading. I now have done so, with as example the photograph you probably used for extraction (?, because you mention the other image File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.156397 1 - Cytora pallida Hutton - Liareidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg with has no shells). Please check if this explanation is clear enough. Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 08:34, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I linked the wrong photo when I uploaded, which I didn't notice until now. Thanks for pointing it out, I'll fix that shortly. So if I'm understanding it correctly, it's the width of the black line above "Liareida... 40431" that measures 38 mm long? It would mean that my image scaling was wrong, since my scale makes it ~30 mm wide. —Mike moral ♪♫ 08:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No i was told is was the width of the text string which was formatted in a standard way apparently, not the black line, i apologize. I'm sorry Naturalis didn't use a simple scale bar. Thanks for your interest! Hansmuller (talk) 08:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikemoral: @Mikemoral I'm emailing and asking a Naturalis mollusc collection expert to be sure. Hansmuller (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for doing so. I must admit confusing me still, though I think that might just be the way the museum described it. Thanks for responding so quickly! I figured it would be helpful to include a small scale bar to give a better sense of width of shells, as well as crop out the taxonomic information.. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikemoral: @Mikemoral I've corrected a numerical error on the page Category:Mollusca at Naturalis from the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie. As long as the originals with taxonomy are conserved and linked, no information is lost and of course scale bars are extremely useful. (Just speculating: there still must be many tiny mollusc species which are undiscovered up to now.). I'll keep you posted (the definitive answer might take some time, my Naturalis mollusc expert(s) might be on holiday now.) Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 09:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's almost certainly new molluscs to discover. Even still, we have to sort out molluscs we already know and make sure we have classified them correctly. Some like w:Notoplax rubiginosa got names that changed later on to reflect what zoologists know about the molluscs. Thanks again for your time. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deelnemers verlaten het ‘Liefde faalt nooit!’-congres van Jehovah’s Getuigen, Utrecht, 2 augustus 2019 - 2.jpg

File:Deelnemers verlaten het ‘Liefde faalt nooit!’-congres van Jehovah’s Getuigen, Utrecht, 2 augustus 2019 - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.81.216.78 21:31, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Edoderoo @Edoderoo: Dag Edo, misschien vind je dit en de ondergenoemde foto een interessant geval. Groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Edoderoo Dank voor je snelle reactie, Hansmuller (talk) 09:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deelnemers verlaten het ‘Liefde faalt nooit!’-congres van Jehovah’s Getuigen, Utrecht, 2 augustus 2019 - 3.jpg

File:Deelnemers verlaten het ‘Liefde faalt nooit!’-congres van Jehovah’s Getuigen, Utrecht, 2 augustus 2019 - 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.81.216.78 21:33, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that the dutch AVG (which handles processing personal data) avoids people from making pictures in the public space. So no reason to delete these images. If we have to, we should delete *all* images every made in The Netherlands where there is one pixel of a person, and that can't be true. Edoderoo (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.AVES.136791 1 - Acrocephalus orientalis (Temminck & Schlegel, 1847) - Sylviidae - bird skin specimen.jpeg

File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.AVES.136791 1 - Acrocephalus orientalis (Temminck & Schlegel, 1847) - Sylviidae - bird skin specimen.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

168.9.214.50 19:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Frederick Hendrick van den Hove

Hallo Hansmuller, je had die category aangemaakt zoals ik zopas vaststelde,. Ik ging ervan uit dat het, gezien de inscriptie: F.H. van Hove dus Category:Frederick Hendrik van Hove was, nu weet ik het ook niet meer. Heb je een oplossing? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 16:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje Beste Lotje, leuk van je te horen. Ik zie nu ook dat ik in 2016 blijkbaar cat Frederick Hendrick (2x ck) van den Hove aanmaakte (straal vergeten), en jij cat Frederick Hendrik (1x ck, 1x k) van den Hove in 2019. De RKD (die volgde ik denkelijk) en Biografisch Portaal enzovoorts houden het op Frederick Hendrick, en noemen de Hendrik-variant NIET, maar het British Museum noemt hem wel Hendrik (Frederick Hendrik Van Hove, zonder den, doet Fred ook wel op zijn prenten, hij weet niet zeker hoe hij zelf heet)! Dus de Britten spellen Hendrik Nederlands en de Nederlanders Engels. (Terwijl Fred zelf zich steeds achter zijn initialen verschuilt.) Ik vind het natuurlijk prima als je een keuze maakt en het alternatief via een redirect naar je keuze leidt, terwijl die andere category zelf kan worden opgeruimd. Als ik het moet doen hoor ik het wel, bedankt! (Ik ben altijd heel braaf en volg de RKD.) Hansmuller (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hansmuller, fijn dat je het allemaal even grondig doornam. Omdat je zo braaf bent :-) en duidelijk meer ervaring hebt met het RKD laat ik het initiatief aan jou over. thnks. Lotje (talk) 04:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje Ervaring mag niet tellen op wiki, moet juist opgedaan worden, bovendien heb je wel veel ervaring. Anders zou ik activiteiten gaan hamsteren, anderen verdringen en logischerwijs daarom in de limiet ook onmogelijk veel meer moeten doen (een exponentiële spiraal?). Van Hove is kwa opleiding een Vlaming, hoe spellen jullie hem? (Volgens de RKD zou jij dan misschien Lottje moeten heten?) Groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 06:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grappig dat je dit op deze manier verwoordt. Ik wist niet dat men als Vlaming kan worden opgeleid in Nederland (interessante piste overigens). De beste manier om de correcte schrijfwijze van een naam te ontdekken is volgens mij: het lemma een duwtje in de rug geven en zien hoe gereageerd wordt. :-) Groetjes. Lotje (talk) 10:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje Nog even: Fred van den Hove werd in Antwerpen tot schilder opgeleid, en was daar lid van een gilde. Hansmuller (talk) 11:59, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rijksmuseum (25280609339).jpg

Hallo Hansmuller, only me again... Heb ik het goed dat de beschrijving werd overgenomen van Wikipedia? Nogal onoverzichtelijk met al die referentielinks. Zou jij daar iets aan wijzigen? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 11:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje Het ziet er naar uit dat Hanno die keer inderdaad een razende haast had... ja, ik zou daar iets aan doen. Hansmuller (talk) 11:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Hans Rosenberg - Instabilities in the solar corona - titelpagina proefschrift, Utrecht, 1973.jpg

Copyright status: File:Hans Rosenberg - Instabilities in the solar corona - titelpagina proefschrift, Utrecht, 1973.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Rosenberg - Instabilities in the solar corona - titelpagina proefschrift, Utrecht, 1973.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:25, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion 12/2019, after previous unsuccessful attemps to convince the mischievous deleter.., Hansmuller (talk) 11:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Hansmuller/Archive 2019,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Hansmuller/Archive 2019,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Hansmuller/Archive 2019,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4499 - A painting depicting human trafficking showing a man holding a chained woman in the desert.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4499 - A painting depicting human trafficking showing a man holding a chained woman in the desert.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4499 - A painting depicting human trafficking showing a man holding a chained woman in the desert.jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eissink (talk) 21:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, although PD-Somalia applies. Nice courtesy to the artist by a moderator! Hansmuller (talk) 11:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4484 - A painting depicting an animal story with a lion, a bleeding camel and other animals. A mathematical geometric series of 0.5 - Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4484 - A painting depicting an animal story with a lion, a bleeding camel and other animals. A mathematical geometric series of 0.5 - Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eissink (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

* Deleted, although PD-Somalia applies. Courtesy to the artist by a moderator! Hansmuller (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4484 - A painting depicting an animal story with a lion, a bleeding camel and other animals. A mathematical geometric series of 0.5 - Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa (cropped).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4484 - A painting depicting an animal story with a lion, a bleeding camel and other animals. A mathematical geometric series of 0.5 - Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4484 - A painting depicting an animal story with a lion, a bleeding camel and other animals. A mathematical geometric series of 0.5 - Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa (cropped).jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eissink (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, although PD-Somalia applies. Nice courtesy to the artist by a moderator! Hansmuller (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4464 - A wall painting showing a tree with a sun, pyramids and a reading boy in a wheelchair. Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa (Hargeysa Cultural Centre).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4464 - A wall painting showing a tree with a sun, pyramids and a reading boy in a wheelchair. Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa (Hargeysa Cultural Centre).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4464 - A wall painting showing a tree with a sun, pyramids and a reading boy in a wheelchair. Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa (Hargeysa Cultural Centre).jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eissink (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, although PD-Somalia applies. Nice courtesy to the artist by a moderator! Hansmuller (talk) 11:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Omslagdoek met portretten van Mozambikaanse regeringsleiders TMnr 6163-4-versie2.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Omslagdoek met portretten van Mozambikaanse regeringsleiders TMnr 6163-4-versie2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eissink (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got {{KIT-license}}, Hansmuller (talk) 11:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - Nigeria 1970 - 1973 - 01 - 010 Toro College. Color painting of a human figure (Fulani?). Work of a student - Toro.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - Nigeria 1970 - 1973 - 01 - 010 Toro College. Color painting of a human figure (Fulani?). Work of a student - Toro.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - Nigeria 1970 - 1973 - 01 - 010 Toro College. Color painting of a human figure (Fulani?). Work of a student - Toro.jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eissink (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - 28 - Yellow canvas with four silhouettes and text "Robben Island" - 2015 (cropped).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - 28 - Yellow canvas with four silhouettes and text "Robben Island" - 2015 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - 28 - Yellow canvas with four silhouettes and text "Robben Island" - 2015 (cropped).jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eissink (talk) 21:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, although it is a government logo and should be public domain in South-Africa, Hansmuller (talk) 12:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - 28 - Yellow canvas with four silhouettes and text "Robben Island" - 2015.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - 28 - Yellow canvas with four silhouettes and text "Robben Island" - 2015.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - 28 - Yellow canvas with four silhouettes and text "Robben Island" - 2015.jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eissink (talk) 21:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, although it is a government logo and should be public domain in South-Africa, Hansmuller (talk) 12:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- See requests at User_talk:VIGNERON#Commons:Deletion_requests/File:ASC_Leiden_-_Rietveld_Collection_-_28_-_Yellow_canvas_with_four_silhouettes_and_text_"Robben_Island"_-_2015_(cropped).jpg and w:User_talk:Discott#Copyright_image_from_Robben_Island_Museum?. Hansmuller (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ontbrekende toestemming

Dag Hansmuller, ik heb zojuist bij acht van door jou geüploade bestanden aangegeven dat de toestemming van de auteur (de kunstenaars die de schilderingen maakten etc.) ontbreekt. Waar sommigen een OTRS-toestemming voor de foto dragen, geldt die toestemming uiteraard niet het afgebeelde werk. Groet, Eissink (talk) 21:52, 4 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

@Eissink In ieder geval heeft File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Omslagdoek met portretten van Mozambikaanse regeringsleiders TMnr 6163-4-versie2.jpg bij de bron een CC-licentie zoals je kunt zien, dus die nominatie kun je nu al intrekken. Ik zal eens kijken hoe het zit met auteursrecht in Somaliland, in Nigeria is het ook anders (kortere termijnen). Kunstwerken in de openbare ruimte kunnen ook anders liggen. Vriendelijke groet, Hansmuller (talk) 10:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC) PS En dan is er nog Zuid-Afrika.[reply]

Ik denk niet dat het Tropenmuseum de rechten bezit op de gebruikte foto's, waarvan de fotografen ook niet worden genoemd. Eissink (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

(Aantekeningen: Copyright_rules_by_territory/Nigeria , idem Somalia , idem Somaliland , idem South Africa , Robben Island infow@robben-island.org.za , two-dimensional art in public spaces )

ik denk dat het tropenmuseum in het algemeen iets moet worden uitgelegd over auteursrechten. Als zij een voorwerp in hun bezit hebben, hebben ze niet automatisch het auteursrecht van een foto van dat voorwerp. In het geval van deze doek zijn er verschillende rechthebbenden:

- De ontwerper van de doek. Daar rust auteursrecht op als de ontwerper nog leeft / minder dan 70 jaar geleden overleden is.
- De maker van de foto's die op het doek zijn gebruikt

Dit geldt bijna overal. Het is jammer, maar we zien vaker dat dit niet goed gaat met uploads in het kader van GLAM. Ik begrijp dit niet, er zijn toch veel mensen bij WMNL die dit begeleiden en van de hoed en de rand weten? Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 17:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellywa en @Eissink Jullie punt is duidelijk. Maar merk op dat bijvoorbeeld het Rijksmuseum voor de Nachtwacht de fotograaf ook niet vermeldt, dat is niet gebruikelijk bij musea: File:La_ronda_de_noche,_por_Rembrandt_van_Rijn.jpg met bron RMUS en link, er staat net als bij de COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM in de bron alleen een licentie (daar publiek domein), geen vermelding van de fotograaf. Dan mogen we aannemen dat die is afgekocht of in dienst, of het nu om een schilderij gaat of een doek maakt niet uit, nietwaar? (Vraag maar verwijdering van Rembrandt aan!) Hansmuller (talk) 09:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Waar ik sprak over fotografen, bedoelde ik de fotografen van de portretfoto's van de presidenten die zijn gebruikt op het omslagdoek, bij de foto waarvan je zei dat ik de nominatie zou kunnen intrekken. Ook Ellywa doelde daar op. Het is inderdaad niet gebruikelijk dat de werk- of opdrachtnemer die voor een museum fotografeert wordt genoemd en dat lijkt me een goed en vanzelfsprekend gebruik. Eissink (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

@Ellywa en @Eissink O, sorry. Ik vraag iemand van Wereldculturen.nl (Tropen-, - Volkenkunde, Afrika-Museum). Hansmuller (talk) 13:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got {{KIT-license}}, Hansmuller (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4666 - Sleeping dog on a street of Hargeysa (cropped).jpg

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4666 - Sleeping dog on a street of Hargeysa (cropped).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4666 - Sleeping dog on a street of Hargeysa (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 10:27, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa Don't worry, the license is of course {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}} , approved by the Dutch OTRS. Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got OTRS-ticket alright..., Hansmuller (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4666 - Sleeping dog on a street of Hargeysa.jpg

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4666 - Sleeping dog on a street of Hargeysa.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4666 - Sleeping dog on a street of Hargeysa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 10:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa Don't worry, the license is of course {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}} , approved by the Dutch OTRS. Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got OTRS-ticket alright..., Hansmuller (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Hans Hubenet, Hans Rosenberg en Mart de Groot - Sterrenwacht Sonnenborgh, Servaasbolwerk, Utrecht 1968-1969.jpg

Copyright status: File:Hans Hubenet, Hans Rosenberg en Mart de Groot - Sterrenwacht Sonnenborgh, Servaasbolwerk, Utrecht 1968-1969.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Hubenet, Hans Rosenberg en Mart de Groot - Sterrenwacht Sonnenborgh, Servaasbolwerk, Utrecht 1968-1969.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 17:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa Dear JuTa, what are you at? A licensing mail from the photographer for CC-BY-SA has been sent to the Dutch permission-OTRS as you can see (OTRS-pending), please patience... Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 19:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got OTRS-Ticket alright... Hansmuller (talk) 11:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Onaangenaam

Dag, Hansmuller. Ik vind het onaangenaam, dat je mij in een onheus daglicht heb willen plaatsen door een goedbedoeld bericht alhier (dat ik bovendien als inmiddels overbodig alweer had verwijderd) op mijn Nederlandse overlegpagina te plaatsen en vervolgens ook nog eens Taketa in de waan laat dat je dat op mijn verzoek, een verzoek per e-mail dan nog wel, zou hebben gedaan. Over je opmerking over mijn 'psychologie' zal ik me maar niet uitlaten. Wel eens van AGF gehoord? Groet, Eissink (talk) 13:15, 10 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Wat kan AGF zijn? Afko's kunnen beter vermeden worden in commu ;-). Niet boos worden, kijk naar jezelf, je verhaal klopt niet, je veronderstelt veel te veel, gewoon lezen. Ik zou het wel fijn vinden als we constructief aan de encyclopedie en Commons kunnen werken, zonde van onze tijd allemaal. Ik zie je nieuwe artikelen en afbeeldingen graag tegemoet. Groetjes, Hansmuller (talk) 08:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tiff picture file 88MB

File:Affiche Sida.jpg

Hello.

Thanks a lot adding your picture in Wikipedia "ASC_Leiden_-_van_Achterberg_Collection_-_1_-_147_-_Un_panneau_routier_avertit_de_l'infection_par_le_SIDA._"Le_SIDA_tue._Ensemble_stoppons_le_SIDA"_-_En_route_de_Bamako_pour_Ségou,_Mali_-_9-29_novembre_1996.tif". Unfortunately it size is really huge (88 MB !), in an inappropriate file format, and with a too long file name. This kind of picture should only weight about 3 or 4 MB. I did geometric changes and light corrections on your picture, and store it in jpeg format with a shorter name, that only weight 3 MB now, that I sent in this page. Details about the place, the date, and comment shouldn't be inserted in the file name, but in Wikipedia descriptions fields. I advise you to delete your previous file and send again this version with your own.

Best regards. --GodefroyParis (talk) 11:14, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @GodefroyParis, Thank you for your interest, but what is your problem? There are some misunderstandings, nowadays everything i did is just standard and easily achievable. (Please don't call me "Hello".)

large version a problem, why? No, Wikipedia does NOT use the 88 MB version in the webpage SIDA where i put the image, but automatically a standard small version. On Commons you'll find a lot (5) of smaller versions included on the page

File:ASC_Leiden_-_van_Achterberg_Collection_-_1_-_147_-_Un_panneau_routier_avertit_de_l'infection_par_le_SIDA._"Le_SIDA_tue._Ensemble_stoppons_le_SIDA"_-_En_route_de_Bamako_pour_Ségou,_Mali_-_9-29_novembre_1996.tif .

So it is NOT necessary to create a secondary image. The original loads quickly, because a small version is used...

too long file name, why? The file name is NOT too long, why would it be? MediaWiki, Unix etcetera support long filenames. Now you can tell what the image shows without having to look up the metadata, very practical to many users. So yes, all the important data should be included in the file name. I have used long descriptive filenames in nearly 280.000 uploads to Commons without problems.
wrong format, why? No, .jpg is lossy, so tif(f) is the best there is, for any graphical use with the most information included, ask a publishing house, that's why the file is huge, there you are right. It should be.
wrong author. By the way, I see you put the wrong author on your version, you probably did not notice, but you violated the copyright, please correct. You did not include the metadata and the source.

If you don't understand, we can discuss all of this further.

Bon jour et au revoir, Hansmuller (talk) 21:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS If my French in the metadata is wrong here and there, could you be so kind to correct it? (I take it that you are French?) Thanks a lot, Hansmuller (talk) 21:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS2 @GodefroyParis You are right, in that your version is brighter and so looks better (but it does no longer contain the full original information), thanks! You can indicate in your metadata that your version is a version of the original image, key word "other_versions=". Can i include your derived version in the collection Category:Images from the African Studies Centre (Leiden)? Merci! Hansmuller (talk) 10:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS3 Dear @GodefroyParis I have fielded a question about .tif(f) at Commons:Village_pump#.tif(f)_or_.jpg/.jpeg_image_files?

In the end, this smaller version was deleted by Hedwig_in_Washington because metadata was lacking, Hansmuller (talk) 12:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection - 1 - 006 - Des palmiers au bord de la plage - Kribi, Cameroun - 6-12 février 1997.tif

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection - 1 - 006 - Des palmiers au bord de la plage - Kribi, Cameroun - 6-12 février 1997.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection - 1 - 006 - Des palmiers au bord de la plage - Kribi, Cameroun - 6-12 février 1997.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:42, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS pending |year=2019|month=10|day=27}} Hansmuller (talk) 14:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently 1 - 006 Kribi was a spurious file. The originals

File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4726 - Somali National television. A screen with a bespectacled speaker and microphones addressing the public at another book fair, July 2019.jpg

File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4726 - Somali National television. A screen with a bespectacled speaker and microphones addressing the public at another book fair, July 2019.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Following your message this file has been deleted by an Administrator, not by me. Please click on the red link to know his/her name so you can talk about "dictatorship" with him/her. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel @Patrick_Rogel Oh, excuse me, je me suis laissé emporter, perhaps Commons is a benevolent dictatorship by the way, of course decisions have to made, sorry again. Cordialement, Hansmuller (talk) 10:33, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got {{PD-Somalia}} license, Hansmuller (talk) 12:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naamgeving File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection

Hoi Hans, in je naamgeving heb je nu de naam van de collectie aan het begin gezet waardoor alles onder dezelfde letter terechtkomt (dit geval de A). Zou je voor je verdere uploads de collectie en inventarisnummer aan het einde willen zetten? Ik gebruik bijvoorbeeld File:Caspar Netscher - De messenslijper - 67 - Sabauda Gallery.jpg als model voor de titels. Ik zag trouwens je vraag over tiffs. Altijd de beste kwaliteit van de bron uploaden en nooit bestandsconversies doen. Multichill (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Multichill Beste Multichill,

Leuk van je te horen. Inderdaad is zo'n keuze van de filenaam altijd discutabel ben ik bang. Ik heb al jaren een soort herkomsttraditie gevolgd (van Husky, niet zelf bedacht). Die spoort met mijn opleiding als "middelbaar archiefambtenaar" (historisch niet-academisch archivist, voordat ik natuurkunde enzovoort ging afmaken): de structuur van het archief behouden, die de archiefvormer (een gemeente, een Nobelprijswinnaar Lorentz enzovoorts) vanwege de functie van het archief eraan heeft gegeven, was daar de mantra.

Daarom zet ik de collectiegegevens voorop, gevolgd door auteur en beschrijving met jaartal. De files komen dan in hun categorie in de volgorde van hun nummering bij de collectievormer (museumcatalogus, inventaris of diadoos), zo is makkelijk te zien welke ontbreken, bijvoorbeeld in een Images from.. categorie (vergaarbak Category:Images from the African Studies Centre (Leiden)).

Ze komen hierdoor meestal ook op chronologische volgorde (Category:Somaliland 2019 (van de Bruinhorst Collection)) te staan, en op volgorde van bladzijden in het boek waar ze soms uit gescand/gefotografeerd zijn (ondermappen van Category:Prints from the Peace Palace Library) of met een verdere thematische onderverdeling (Category:Dogon (W.E.A. van Beek Collection)). Nadelen zijn te ondervangen met extra categorieën op auteur ("Photographs by") type

Category:Photographs_by_Ohannes_Kurkdjian_from_KITLV

bijvoorbeeld voor

File:KITLV - 154157 - Kurkdjian, N.V. Photografisch Atelier - Soerabaia-Java - Borobudur in Magelang - circa 1915.tiff

Ik zou je foto van een schilderij van Caspar Netscher dus "Galleria Sabauda - 067 - Caspar Netscher - De messenslijper, 1662.jpg" of iets dergelijks (of 0067? hoeveel catalogusnummers komen er nog?) gedoopt hebben.

In ander verband kan het inderdaad lastig zijn dat alles van het Afrika-Studiecentrum enzovoorts altijd op de A terecht komt.

Heb je een schrijnend voorbeeld?
Hoe kan ik de ordening van de herkomst behouden maar ook aan jouw wens voldoen?

Fijn dat je me steunt wat de tiffs betreft. Ik kreeg geen antwoord op de volgende vragen, weet jij vast wel:

Kan het op den duur een probleem zijn dat een tiff van alles kan bevatten, in tegenstelling tot een .jpg. Loopt de .tiff daardoor een risico om over zeg 50 jaar niet meer gelezen te kunnen worden, en de simpeler en lossy .jpg wel?

Bedankt, met vriendelijke groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 16:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Als ik jou was, zou ik File:Caspar Netscher - De messenslijper - 67 - Sabauda Gallery.jpg trouwens "Netscher, Caspar - De messenslijper - 67 - Sabauda Gallery.jpg" noemen. Wikigroet, Hansmuller (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Multichill Tiffs blijven waarschijnlijk leesbaar op de lange duur? ondanks mogelijk onregelmatig format? Naamgeving files: User:KITbot begon ook met COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM, zou je nu niet meer doen? (In w:c:Category:Images from the Tropenmuseum / Wereldculturen staan de plaatjes nu op alfabetische volgorde van de beschrijving "A bridal", "A man" etc., fraai?) Vriendelijke groet, Hansmuller (talk) 09:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Current cars’ fuel consumptions do not vary as speed squared, Prius and BMW 318ti - David J.C. MacKay - Sustainable energy without the Hot Air page 260, 2009 - figure256.png

File:Current cars’ fuel consumptions do not vary as speed squared, Prius and BMW 318ti - David J.C. MacKay - Sustainable energy without the Hot Air page 260, 2009 - figure256.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Robotje (talk) 15:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Powers of cars (Ferrari, Porsche, Kadett, Panda, kW) versus their top speeds (km per h) - Hendrik Tennekes in David J.C. MacKay - Sustainable energy without the Hot Air page 260, 2009 - figure257.png

File:Powers of cars (Ferrari, Porsche, Kadett, Panda, kW) versus their top speeds (km per h) - Hendrik Tennekes in David J.C. MacKay - Sustainable energy without the Hot Air page 260, 2009 - figure257.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Robotje (talk) 15:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Car fuel consumption (energy per distance) when driving at steady speed - David J.C. MacKay - Sustainable energy without the Hot Air page 259, 2009 - figure321.png

File:Car fuel consumption (energy per distance) when driving at steady speed - David J.C. MacKay - Sustainable energy without the Hot Air page 259, 2009 - figure321.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Robotje (talk) 15:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doosjes

File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.186584 1 - Erronea cylindrica (Von Born, 1778) - Cypraeidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg. Multichill (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4345- "Redsea bookshop. Carwo Redsea". Storefront of a bookshop in Hargeisa, Somaliland.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4345- "Redsea bookshop. Carwo Redsea". Storefront of a bookshop in Hargeisa, Somaliland.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, ~riley (talk) 23:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@~riley (A) Dear ~riley (A), in the meantime a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license with permission has been sent (for the second time?) to OTRS-nl by the author of these photographs Gerard van de Bruinhorst, Afrika-Studiecentrum Leiden. Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 14:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hansmuller/Archive 2019

NIMH

Catégorie des oiseaux

Long page

A barnstar for you!

A barnstar for you!

A barnstar for you!

Regarding Naturalis uploads

Copyright status: File:Hans Rosenberg - Instabilities in the solar corona - titelpagina proefschrift, Utrecht, 1973.jpg

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4499 - A painting depicting human trafficking showing a man holding a chained woman in the desert.jpg

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4484 - A painting depicting an animal story with a lion, a bleeding camel and other animals. A mathematical geometric series of 0.5 - Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa.jpg

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4484 - A painting depicting an animal story with a lion, a bleeding camel and other animals. A mathematical geometric series of 0.5 - Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa (cropped).jpg

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4464 - A wall painting showing a tree with a sun, pyramids and a reading boy in a wheelchair. Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa (Hargeysa Cultural Centre).jpg

File tagging File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Omslagdoek met portretten van Mozambikaanse regeringsleiders TMnr 6163-4-versie2.jpg

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - Nigeria 1970 - 1973 - 01 - 010 Toro College. Color painting of a human figure (Fulani?). Work of a student - Toro.jpg

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - 28 - Yellow canvas with four silhouettes and text "Robben Island" - 2015 (cropped).jpg

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - Rietveld Collection - 28 - Yellow canvas with four silhouettes and text "Robben Island" - 2015.jpg

Ontbrekende toestemming

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4666 - Sleeping dog on a street of Hargeysa (cropped).jpg

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4666 - Sleeping dog on a street of Hargeysa.jpg

Copyright status: File:Hans Hubenet, Hans Rosenberg en Mart de Groot - Sterrenwacht Sonnenborgh, Servaasbolwerk, Utrecht 1968-1969.jpg

Onaangenaam

Tiff picture file 88MB

Copyright status: File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection - 1 - 006 - Des palmiers au bord de la plage - Kribi, Cameroun - 6-12 février 1997.tif

Naamgeving File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection

Important message for file movers

Doosjes

File tagging File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4345- "Redsea bookshop. Carwo Redsea". Storefront of a bookshop in Hargeisa, Somaliland.jpg

Navigation menu

Search