User talk:Faolin42

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thanks and questions

[edit]

Hi John ... First off, thanks for all the great stuff you do for our common hobby. It seems we share a passion. Although I've pretty well covered the SF Bay Area on my photo excursions the past 5+ years, I look forward to playing with your Android app. However, when I go to the Android store on my AT&T phone and search for 'unvisited', all I get is an app that maps restaurants (I think). Any suggestions for finding the app?

As you may have noticed, I've been adding Massachusetts NRHP photos to architecture- and date-specific categories. I've found one of yours that I think is mis-identified. The MACRIS entry for the Eleazer Hyde House in Waban, MA describes the 18th-century Georgian house to the west of the large late-19th-century Queen Anne house in your photo. Your photo is of 389 Woodward St., the Frederick H. Henshaw House. With your consent, I'd like to change the description and categorize the photo accordingly.

Regards, --Sanfranman59 (talk) 21:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! Thanks for catching my house mistake! Feel free to correct, recategorize and/or rename my photos. It's on my todo list to reconcile my photos against MACRIS. I guess I better speed that up... I've started naming a lot of my photos with the street address, and getting photos of the street address too.
And I don't know if it's a different site, but try the Google Play Store for the app... Unvisited On my devices I click on the 'Play Store' app, a shopping bag icon with a multi-colored triangle. Faolin42 (talk) 22:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great minds ... I also include addresses in the names of my photo files. Unfortunately, this doesn't help if addresses have changed since properties were listed on the NRHP. I'm finding that happens occasionally, especially in New England. In fact, I think I've found an instance of this with another of your photos, the George Carpenter House in Uxbridge. MACRIS has the address as 53 S. Main St., instead of the 67 S. Main St. address that's in the NRHP database. I can barely make out the house pictured in MACRIS behind trees and bushes in Google Maps street view, about 250 feet north of the building in your photo.
Re your Android app, it's Google Play on my phone as well. The only app hit I get when I search for "Unvisited" is "Placemarks" by "DNLB" (last updated 8/9/2012). I assume that's not your baby? --Sanfranman59 (talk) 23:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it's not showing up because I didn't support your version of Android. You can find the version by going into Settings, then selecting About Device. I think I only support 3.0 and above right now. If that's the problem, let me know what your version number is, and I can figure out if I can change Unvisited to support it. Faolin42 (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Uxbridge, MA is one of the reasons I started using more addresses as the name. Faolin42 (talk) 23:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ... that's the reason. My phone is more than two years old now. It's version 2.3.6. I've never thought about updating the OS. Is that even possible on these things? --Sanfranman59 (talk) 00:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the Google Play store only shows apps supported by your phone. Not sure I would recommend trying to upgrade android on your phone. I'm pretty sure I can change my app to run on 2.3.6. Probably not a big change, I just need to research it. Faolin42 (talk) 00:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I did some research about upgrading my phone and it doesn't seem like something I want to attempt. If you make your app compatible with 2.3.6, drop me a line so I know to look for it. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aaron River Reservoir, Cohassset MA.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aaron River Reservoir, Cohassset MA.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mill site, Fork Factory Brook, Medfield MA.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mill site, Fork Factory Brook, Medfield MA.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 18:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Signal Hill, Canton MA.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Signal Hill, Canton MA.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stodders Neck, Weymouth Back River Reservation, Hingham MA.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Webb Memorial State Park, Hingham MA.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Webb Memorial State Park, Hingham MA.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 18:29, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Info added

[edit]

I've added the missing info for the files. Faolin42 (talk) 00:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

[edit]

Dear Faolin42,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Faolin42,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
File:Rochdale Historical Sign, Rochdale MA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 21:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Faolin42,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Main Street, 2014, Nashua NH.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nashua City Hall, Nashua NH.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Palace Theatre, Manchester NH.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 16:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Southern New Hampshire Medical Center, Nashua NH.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 16:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Thomas More College of Liberal Arts in Winter, Merrimack NH.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 17:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Faolin42,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Mosaics

[edit]

Out of curiosity, could you go into a little detail of how you constructed the photo mosaics on display at the WikiConference? —Dispenser (talk) 05:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The mosaics are "labors of love". The whole process takes about a day. Automated steps mixed with judgment of the results. When I mention writing programs below, I wrote them a while ago, not specifically for the Wikipedia mosaics. Here are the excruciating details...

1) Scanned Wikimedia for photographs of the united states. I looked for photos taken by and submitted by registered Wikipedia users, and actually used on a Wikipedia page. I was looking for Wikipedia photographers who also illustrate articles.

2) At this point I had about 425 photos.

3) Turned each photo into a 65x65 thumbnail with JThumbnailDirectoryJob.java. This lets me manually select which portion of each photo should be the thumbnail image. Often I extract multiple thumbnails from a single photos.

4) At this point I had a directory of about 420 thumbnails.

5) Then I ran JMosaicFrame.java on each thumbnail. It uses the thumbnail as the big picture, expanding each pixel to 65x65. Then it fills in each 65x65 cell of the big picture with one of the other little thumbnails from the directory. To make a perfect match for the required pixel color, it makes the little thumbnail lighter or darker, and draws a colored border around the little thumbnail.

6) I ran this program for every thumbnail creating 420 mosaics, one for each little thumbnail.

7) Then I figure out which thumbnails made good big picture mosaics. I run JCompareOKJob.java on the mosaic directory, which lets me skim the mosaics, deleting the ones that don't work. Usually, this is because the thumbnail is too complicated.

8) At this point I had 358 different photo mosaics.

9) Checked how many photos I had for each state to make sure I had at least 2 for each state. Then chose some more photos for states that didn't have enough.

10) Made thumbnails out of the new photos and repeated steps 5-9 until I had at least 2 thumbnails for each state.

11) The I ran JPosterizeImage.java to crop all the mosaics into a 13x19 inch format and put a caption on each one. This included the list of Wikipedia photographers with images in the mosaics.

12) Skimmed the resulting mosaics, winnowing them down until I had the 10 I liked best.

13) Took the 10 jpg files to my local print shop. They print 13x19 images for 3 bucks each. Custom sizes are much more expensive.

I make a lot of mosaics for dog shelters. I love dogs and they make really good large and small images!

Faolin42 (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. While I was hoping that you invented a new automated technique, the posters did inspire me to start saving the download thumbnails from a bot checking all thumbnails. All roughly 20 million images should be done and available on Tool Labs in October/November. Wish I could do more, but I'm over committed. Dispenser (talk) 16:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know what happens with that and/or how to access the thumbnails. I'd be interested. That woild shortcut part of my process. Also, you could probably do a web search for photo-mosaics. I'm pretty sure there's free software out there to make them automatically. "free photomosaic maker" gets 90,000 results in google. I just had special requirements, and needed/liked a lot of control. Faolin42 (talk) 16:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
/home/dispenser/cache_thumbs.py and /home/dispenser/commons/thumb are the script and thumbnail directory on Tool Labs. The database u2815_p.thumbsrequested_64 recorded 3,664,315 downloads (9.4 GiB), but due to crashes more exist on disk. Delete/move detection has not been implemented and at some point (like with WMF) it'll hit the file system node limit.

I was planning on using Metapixel due to the CLI interface. However, I was discouraged by the JPEG-artifact-like results in examples (although this may be due to compression) at which point I decided to just ask what you used. Dispenser (talk) 21:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Worcester Country Club

[edit]

-Hi John - please remove your photo of Worcester Country Club for the reasons cited on the commons talk page of the same photo. thank you. User:VictorIII

I removed the photo from the Wikipedia pages, so you can put a better image on. See Commons:Deletion requests for how to request the deletion of an image altogether, if you think the image File:Worcester_Country_Club,_Worcester_MA.jpg itself should be deleted. I won't object. Faolin42 (talk) 18:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Haviland Thin Mints from the Stop and Shop, Lexington MA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 13:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Thank you for posting a picture of Foxborough Universalist Church on the town's Wikipedia page. I think that's very helpful of you. :)

If you want, feel free to post a picture of the other churches in Foxborough, too.
File:Tiny 18 car pile-up in a Christmas Village, Lexington MA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vikiçizer (talk) 12:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shawsheen (MBTA station)

[edit]

I was literally out there today getting pictures of this, and then I discovered now that you beat me to the punch. Great work as usual! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your picture was used without attribution

[edit]

Heads up: Your picture was used on Patch.com, but they only attributed it to Wikipedia, not you. --Briancua (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unvisited iOS Search screen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

–Totie (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Methodist Church in Salem

[edit]

The picture you have labeled as Pleasant Street UMC in Salem, NH is incorrect. The building pictured is the Hannah-Tenney UMC, which is now closed. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:187:4503:3D0:B83C:A117:407:6D18 (talk) 00:44, 01 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States - Thank You!

[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States. We're excited to see people uploading thousands of photos from all over the country! You and others have collectively uploaded 4,929 photos so far, all of which are viewable at Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States (sorted by state).

We encourage you to continue contributing through the rest of the month. Uploading your photos of monuments isn't the only way to contribute, however. If you're interested, we have compiled a list of auxiliary ways to contribute - which include improving Wikipedia's coverage of historic and cultural sites, as well as finding existing free photos that can be shared on the Commons. While these contributions don't count towards the contest, we are still keeping track of them and they are great ways to contribute to the spirit of the project.

If you are interesting in contributing to Wikipedia, WikiProject National Register of Historic Places is also great place to start. The WikiProject showcases the work that has been done so far in covering NRHP sites, and can also help you find articles that need improving.

If you're on Twitter, give us a follow @WLMUnitedStates for updates, news, and more.

If you have any questions between now or the end of the month, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Thank you! ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 09:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States – Results!

[edit]
This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2016}} to your userpage!

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,700 people contribute over 11,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. In addition to National Register of Historic Places sites, we welcomed uploads of sites designated by state- and local-level historical institutions and societies. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate Wikipedia articles!

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States! We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret having to narrow it down to just 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other various national contests as they are announced, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 winners.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all participants in the United States to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, and we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events! ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 06:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
Thanks for creating File:Photomosaic of List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016.jpg and File:Photomosaic of List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign endorsements, 2016.jpg! MB298 (talk) 04:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2017!

[edit]
This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!

Hi there! My name is Kevin, one of the organizers of Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Last year, you contributed to our 2016 event. It was a great success thanks to you and many others, with over 1,700 people contributing over 11,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States. Over 1,000 of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, making our open knowledge about United States history and heritage all the better.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information, including updated tips, lists, and prizes. Like last year, you'll be able to upload your new photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, and we hope to see you in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Faolin42,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 00:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Town categories for rail trails

[edit]

For rail trails that extend through more than one or two towns (like the Mass Central Rail Trail), I'm not sure it's useful to place the trail in every single town category. (Just like we wouldn't place a lengthy rail line, highway, or river in every single town in passes through.) I think it's better to only categorize such trails in regional or county categories (as appropriate) and categorize individual images into the towns. What are your thoughts? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:59, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm OK with removing the town categories. I'm having second thoughts about it. It does get rather lengthy. I guess I was hoping for some way of indicating what towns and villages a rail trail goes through. Is there another way of indicating that? Faolin42 (talk) 23:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the towns and villages could be derived from the images themselves. So no need for the town categories on the rail trail itself. Faolin42 (talk) 23:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, and if we happen to have a large number of images in one town on a multi-town trail, subcategories for town segments are okay. (I did that a while back for the Minuteman Bikeway.) Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for uploading so many images of local New England places! Kestreltail (talk) 23:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for your countless contributions to the Wikimedia Commons of important buildings in the greater Boston area. Your works are a outstanding addition to many Wikipedia articles and are beneficial to the Wikimedia foundation as a whole. Babegriev (talk) 21:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Main Street, June 2010, Franklin MA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davidafranklin (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

[edit]

@Faolin42: wondering why this update, since there is the unified login. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was keeping track of which wikipedia's I had added images to. I was removing the links for the languages I had not added a significant number of images to. Faolin42 (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting to know Lotje (talk) 05:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

W

[edit]

FYI: Posts like File:W, Bruce Freeman Rail Trail, East Acton MA.jpg - which I'm thrilled you've made a habit of documenting - are whistle posts, which informed train crews to sound the whistle before approaching a grade crossing, bridge, etc. They can go in Category:Whistle posts in the United States. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll start classifying them as whistle posts. I was just reluctant to jump to conclusions. I'd always assumed the W stood for Water :-) Faolin42 (talk)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fitz Henry Lane

[edit]

The caption on, and file name for, the photo you posted in Wikimedia -- File:Fitz Hugh Lane House, Gloucester MA.jpg -- is out of date. The artist's name was mistakenly thought to be Hugh from the 1930s roughly but is now, as of 2005-6, accepted to have been Henry. The Wikipedia article covers the change with solid citation to John Wilmerding, an impoirtant scholar and curator in the period and the painter's work. The NP Gallery Detail cited with your photo page also says clearly 'Lane, Fitz Henry (formerly known as Fitz Hugh), House'. I don't know how to change the file name but am hoping maybe you could make the change. (There's a Wikimedia Category name that treats 'Fitz Hugh Lane House' as a simple alternate name; also out of date.) I explain a little more in the edit summary for another similar effort here. I understand if you can't take it up. I'll try to at some point if you haven't, I hope. I do think it's good to effect the change throughout Wiki- if possible. There's a Wikimedia link on the Wikipedia article with Hugh, too. Again, I'm not taking that one on right now. Thanks. Swliv (talk) 00:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested the name change on Fitz Hugh Lane House, Gloucester MA.jpg. You can click on the 'Move' tab in Wikimedia to request a name change. That would work for categories as well. Faolin42 (talk) 00:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

North Brookfield

[edit]

I just uploaded this 1910 postcard of North Brookfield and discovered that you took a photo from almost exactly the same spot a century later! It's very cool to see how some things have changed and some have stayed the same. As always, your photographs of New England are such a valuable resource and incredibly appreciated. Best, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thanks! I've always wondered about that, but never tried for it on purpose. Faolin42 (talk) 15:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]