Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 13 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:20220802_Formica_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ants harvesting honeydew from aphids on a plant in Fröttmaning --FlocciNivis 17:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose ants not in focus --Charlesjsharp 19:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. All ants are sharp enough in my opinion. Good colors, good composition. Therefore I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 20:50, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem. It's a little hard to distinguish the aphids until or unless you know what you're looking for, but then it's OK. -- Ikan Kekek 20:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 21:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_mud-puddling_position_of_Caleta_elna_(Hewitson,_1876)_-_Elbowed_Pierrot_Butterfly.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing mud-puddling position of Caleta elna (Hewitson, 1876) - Elbowed Pierrot Butterfly. (by Sarpitabose) --Atudu 16:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think too many parts of the wings are out of focus. --Imehling 17:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Composition and light are good; sharpness is ok enough for QI. Rhododendrites 13:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per others because I think enough of the butterfly is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 20:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 21:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Preening_duck_01.jpg

[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 21:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Preening_duck_02.jpg

[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 21:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Preening_duck_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A duck in Tamil Nadu, India, preening its feathers. By User:Kritzolina --Kritzolina 03:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not in focus --Charlesjsharp 10:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice, but per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek 20:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 21:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Preening_duck_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A duck in Tamil Nadu, India, preening its feathers. By User:Kritzolina --Kritzolina 03:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not in focus --Charlesjsharp 10:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Well the focus might not be exactly at the birds head, but the animal is still looking quite sharp. What am I missing here? --Augustgeyler 09:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles. Many of the feathers lack definition, and ducks are very common. -- Ikan Kekek 20:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 21:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)