Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 09 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

==

[edit]
  • Nomination The Great Hall inside Burton Constable Hall, England --Mdbeckwith 01:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO too unsharp. I'm wondering why. Made without tripod? --XRay 03:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
     Support Good sharpness. Perhaps a bit too bright, but def. QI --Tsungam 06:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
     Oppose - Truly beautiful room, and some parts of this photo are excellent, but I think the ceiling is too unsharp for QI, even at 200% of my laptop screen. -- Ikan Kekek 08:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Weak support 1st: "Weak" because I don't like the extreme perspective. 2nd: The perspective correction is responsible for the increasing unsharpness in the upper parts of the image. But: the resolution is very high, at 100% view the sharpness is acceptable, and if slightly scaled down to still reasonsable 20 Mpixels there is no problem with sharpness any more. Even 6 MPixels would be ok, which could be printed to A4 resp. letter size in good quality. Please remember: 2 MPixels are still allowed (for difficult situations) and only 6 MPixels are often demanded for easy-to-take-pictures. This image has much more, and it is not fair to compare a 200% view to smaller images at 200%. --Smial 07:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
  • To be clear: 200% of the size of my laptop screen, not twice the size of the image! 200% of the size of my laptop screen is quite a lot smaller than the full size of this picture! -- Ikan Kekek 16:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Weak support, seems a bit too bright. GerifalteDelSabana (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose out of focus and overexposed. --Fischer.H 16:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support 50 Mpx. Per Smial -- Basile Morin 02:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Looks ab bit blurred --GPSLeo 14:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too strong distorted. --Ralf Roletschek 10:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support just OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 11:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support o.k. for ne as well.--Ermell 22:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 05:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)