Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 19 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Obernberg_am_Brenner_-_Scheune_-BT-_02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Alpine barn near Obernberg am Brenner (Unterreinsalm). Tyrol, Austria --Basotxerri 16:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • As with the other one:  Oppose for discussion; it's a QI, sure, but isn't it a derivative version of this image? Practice here is that only one version of the same image can be a QI - is this the one you're going for, rather than the colour one?--Peulle 16:45, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment First of all, I haven't nominated yet the other version of the image, so why can't I nominate this one? The other thing is that some months ago, I moved some of Famberhorst's B&W images to CR for the same reason. However noone here could indicate where the rule was written down that different versions of an image couldn't be QI at the same time. So I suggest that it should be added to the rules. Meanwhile, nominating different versions seems OK to me. --Basotxerri 07:14, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Well, one thing is the written rule and the rules in practice is quite another. As I think you understand (I'm just writing it here to clarify my position on record), if a user nominates an image for QI and it passes, (s)he can then make simple alterations to the same image (b/w, simple contrast adjustments, crops etc.) and submit them all. The practice is that QIC is not open to this. As to your first point, I did notice that you did not nominate the colour version (nice catch, eh? I'm like Sherlock Holmes, I see everything. ;) ), which is why I posed the question. :) --Peulle 20:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Anyway, I understand your reasons, Peulle, and that's absolutely OK. --Basotxerri 07:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support What is a derivative and what is a different development? IMO a B&W image is not a derivative if it's development is different from the coloured image. But it is possible, that the coloured photograph is QI and the B&W not and vice versa. An extracted image may be QI and the original not. IMO both can be nominated. Hopefully nobody will nominate photographs developed from the same source with only minor differences... --XRay 13:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "different development". This isn't film photography. All I need to change a colour photo into a b/w photo is to click one button.--Peulle 18:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • For me it's more than one button. IMO colors could improved in another way. Did you ever changed green, red or blue of a b/w image and see the different effect? Try different other option, they are other than colour. --XRay 16:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose in meinen Augen schlechte Löschung der Farbinformationen, keine Ähnlichkeit mit Schwarzweiß. --Ralf Roletschek 14:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Per XRay --PJDespa (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see any rule broken. --GerifalteDelSabana 03:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)