File talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries results by county, 2016.svg

3/26 results

Washington: Sanders has won Wahkiakum, Douglas, Adams, Colombia, and Garfield counties so far. http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/primaries/2016-03-26#WA-Dem --Dereich1 (talk) 19:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

done. MB298 (talk) 20:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

3/23 returns

Sanders won every county in ID except Lewis, and also won Carbon, Emery, Grand, Wayne, Sevier, and Kane in UT so far (though he'll probably win every county). http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/primaries/2016-03-22#summary --Dereich1 (talk) 07:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

March 15 Primaries

All of the counties are in except 2 in Illinois. http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/primaries/2016-03-15 --Dereich1 (talk) 21:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Baca County CO

Baca County CO wasn't a tie; it was won by "uncommitted": http://www.coloradocaucus.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olekinderhook (talk • contribs) 21:23, March 3, 2016‎ (UTC)

I'm just filling it in for Clinton, as she won the most non-uncommitted votes. MB298 (talk) 02:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Also it looks like Pueblo CO went to Clinton --Dereich1 (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Minnesota

@Nizolan: could you add the Minnesota districts as you did with the Republican map? If you can't put the map back in, then just fill, I will do that part for you first. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Just done it, thanks for the heads-up. I relied on an earlier version of the file for the counties in MN so had some difficulties with the rest of the map (hence the repeated uploads), but it should now conform to the last version by MB298. Nizolan (talk) 02:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

grant and garfield counties in nebraska

errors on grant and garfield counties in nebraska - no votes were recorded there. wheeler and fillmore counties were tied: http://nebraskacaucus2016.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olekinderhook (talk • contribs) 14:53, March 6, 2016‎ (UTC)

@Olekinderhook: I will do it but may I suggest you download Inkscape and learn to play with it? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Pueblo CO, and Kansas

--Dereich1 (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC) Pueblo should be marked as a win for Clinton. Also does anyone know where a county map of Kansas results could be found? Looks like someone was able to dig up the one for Minnesota even though that was reported by Cong. District as well.

@Dereich1: at first glance, the Kansas Democratic Party doesn't appear to have released the results except by US congressional district.[1] Also, it is standard practice to put your signature after your comment, not before. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Can the counties be colored in based on their congressional districts? 75.164.96.208 21:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I'll can do that but it would take me several days. If someone else can do it first, feel free. You might want leave the counties intact as a layer underneath in case we eventually get those results. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

As if it wasn't already complicated enough, Kansas has a release the detailed results by... State senate district? Kansas is weird. Anyway, not sure if you want to put it into the map, but the results are more detailed so it will be possible to see where Clinton did well instead one big green spot. http://www.kansasdems.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Results-by-Senate-District-Sheet1-1.pdf --Dereich1 (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

To save you the time looking at the file, Clinton actually only won state district 4 (Outside Kansas City) --Dereich1 (talk) 17:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Messed up border lines

--73.34.229.110 19:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC) I don't know how to edit an SVG file, but some of the border lines seem to be doubled, such as the northern borders of CO and KY, southern border of NE and WV. I guess I'm nitpicking, but does anyone want to fix it?

I posted about this problem at w:WP:GL/M#Commons counties maps have odd county borders. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

 Done. Revamped the map so those extra borders do not appear.—SPESH531Other 06:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Filling in counties before votes are clinched

@MB298: you are filling out counties with ridiculous numbers. When there have been 7 votes cast in a county of 30,000 people, it is not appropriate to fill it in. Please don't fill it in until a candidate has clinched a county. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: I'm continuing to add counties that have reached 100% or nearly 100%, and have refrained from adding undecided counties since your revert. MB298 (talk) 04:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Michigan

Two notes about Michigan. One, Clinton ended up winning Genesee County, which is currently shaded for Bernie. And two, Bernie won Ontonagon county which is yet to be shaded. Full county results can be found here - http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/michigan ~

 Done. MB298 (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Northern Marianas

The Northern Marianas voted earlier in favor of Clinton, but I see that it is not filled in here. Is there any reason behind that or is just that no one has gotten to it yet? Adamtt9 (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC)(adamtt9)

@Adamtt9:  Done. MB298 (talk) 02:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Minnesota individual county results information

Hi, Nizolan. I've been scouring the internet for a while trying to find individual county results for the Minnesota democratic caucuses with no luck. The only places that I've been able to find that do seem to have county results are your national county map and some other user-made Wikipedia maps. I was wondering where you were able to find this information and if each county's percentage results were available. I'm making a map of my own denoting the margin of victory for each candidate by county, and it would be greatly appreciated. Even more desirable would be individual county results for Kansas, but I'm assuming that data hasn't been released yet. Sorry if somehow this isn't the right place to ask, as I've never communicated over Wikipedia like this.

- Alexconnorbrown, 7:47, 20 March, 2016 (UTC)

@Alexconnorbrown: I believe he did it by adding the precincts. There may have been a few counties where that was not possible. Results from the Minnesota Secretary of State. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Nebraska counties

There are two counties (Garfield and Grant) listed in Nebraska as having no data. The results I see indicate that there were 0 votes for both Clinton and Sanders with 100% of precincts reporting. I believe these counties should be shown as tied rather than having no results; it's just that the results are in and both got 0 votes. Rockhead126 (talk) 03:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

@Rockhead126: it's  Done. MB298 (talk) 22:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Wyoming

Teton, Niobrara and Campbell have been won by Bernie. Clinton has won Laramie. Lincoln, Fremont, Hot Springs, Big Horn, Johnson, Washakie, Weston and Crook are ties.

New York

Sanders has won Schoharie, Fulton, Hamilton, Warren, and Cayuga counties. It also appears Clinton won Erie County which needs to be added. You can get full results here! http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/primaries/2016-04-19 --Dereich1 (talk) 02:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

 Done -- MB298 (talk) 04:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Would it be worth it to...

One qualm I have with this map is that the results of each county aren't shaded by margin of victory (it's hard to ascertain, for example, how Clinton won New York and Sanders won Nebraska so convincingly). I wonder if it's worth including a sixth map on the Wikipedia page to reflect this. The NYT has a nice one, and here are the versions for the 2008 Democratic primary and presidential election for more context. 99.235.128.186 07:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

I've been thinking about doing one like that (and keeping this one, of course) for some time now, but the drawback is that it would just take a lot of time to complete such a map. It would be nice to have one like that, because in one county a candidate may win by less than 1 point while in another by 50 or 60 points. MB298 (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

New map created

File:Democratic Party presidential primary results by county by popular vote margin.svg

I've created File:Democratic Party presidential primary results by county by popular vote margin.svg. It isn't close to completion (as of 03:15, 6 May 2016 (UTC) only WA, ID, and WY are complete). MB298 (talk) 03:15, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@MB298: I had planned to do that partially by automated process once everyone was done. I can't imagine the work you'd put into it otherwise. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Yes, that seems like a better way to do things than manually filling out all the counties. MB298 (talk) 03:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@MB298: I've added the file on the right. I couldn't do the locations which we interpreted. Feel free to add to this one. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

@MB298: can you give me the breakdowns by county where you got your data for Minnesota and Maine? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: I used File:Democratic Party presidential primaries results by county, 2016.svg as a starting point; the Maine data is from Politico while Minnesota results were added by User:Nizolan (not sure where it came from). MB298 (talk) 23:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

West Virginia, Guam

As per NYT (http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/west-virginia), Sanders has won all counties in West Virginia with 100% reporting. Also, Guam needs to be filled for Clinton. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.220.132.130 (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Kentucky

I just wanted to point out that the map showing the county results on theguardian.com has different results than the one portrayed here. theguardian results Adamtt9 (talk) 17:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Puerto Rico by municipality

Here are the results which I scraped from the Puerto Rico government websites:

County: Winner Percent Hillary Bernie total

Adjuntas: Hillary 64.2% (318/176/495)
Aguada: Hillary 100.0% (6/0/6)
Aguadilla: Hillary 66.7% (4/2/6)
Aguas Buenas: Hillary 64.4% (308/165/478)
Aibonito: Hillary 100.0% (1/0/1)
Arecibo: Hillary 66.4% (1620/807/2439)
Arroyo: Hillary 77.3% (375/110/485)
Añasco: Hillary 100.0% (1/0/1)
Barceloneta: Hillary 67.3% (403/196/599)
Barranquitas: Bernie 75.0% (1/3/4)
Bayamón: Hillary 53.3% (1689/1468/3167)
Cabo Rojo: Hillary 100.0% (5/0/5)
Caguas: Hillary 56.9% (1697/1276/2982)
Camuy: Hillary 100.0% (2/0/2)
Canóvanas: Hillary 67.5% (902/428/1336)
Carolina: Hillary 62.1% (991/599/1597)
Cataño: Hillary 65.6% (709/367/1081)
Cayey: Hillary 72.8% (276/96/379)
Ceiba: tied NaN% (0/0/0)
Ciales: Hillary 71.5% (338/135/473)
Cidra: Hillary 57.0% (408/303/716)
Coamo: Hillary 74.9% (325/109/434)
Comerío: Hillary 67.5% (482/230/714)
Corozal: Hillary 58.0% (567/401/978)
Culebra: Bernie 50.8% (95/99/195)
Dorado: Hillary 62.4% (762/460/1222)
Fajardo: Hillary 100.0% (1/0/1)
Florida: Hillary 75.2% (255/84/339)
Guayama: tied NaN% (0/0/0)
Guayanilla: Hillary 69.0% (345/153/500)
Guaynabo: Bernie 50.2% (1795/1812/3611)
Gurabo: Hillary 62.6% (1038/615/1659)
Guánica: Hillary 72.5% (224/84/309)
Hatillo: Hillary 66.1% (1073/542/1623)
Hormigueros: Hillary 66.3% (189/94/285)
Humacao: Hillary 66.7% (4/0/6)
Isabela: Hillary 55.7% (611/483/1097)
Jayuya: Hillary 77.1% (472/137/612)
Juana Díaz: Hillary 75.0% (3/1/4)
Juncos: Hillary 66.8% (643/314/962)
Lajas: Hillary 62.0% (227/138/366)
Lares: Hillary 64.5% (548/300/850)
Las Marías: Bernie 63.8% (16/30/47)
Las Piedras: Hillary 100.0% (3/0/3)
Loíza: Hillary 80.4% (344/80/428)
Luquillo: Hillary 100.0% (3/0/3)
Manatí: Hillary 68.8% (616/278/896)
Maricao: tied NaN% (0/0/0)
Maunabo: tied NaN% (0/0/0)
Mayagüez: Hillary 56.7% (880/668/1552)
Moca: Hillary 56.7% (616/466/1086)
Morovis: Hillary 73.2% (426/154/582)
Naguabo: Hillary 68.6% (354/161/516)
Naranjito: Hillary 65.2% (403/215/618)
Orocovis: Hillary 69.4% (286/121/412)
Patillas: Hillary 70.4% (295/124/419)
Peñuelas: Hillary 62.0% (88/53/142)
Ponce: Hillary 66.8% (1949/955/2917)
Quebradillas: Hillary 64.7% (679/360/1050)
Rincón: Bernie 51.1% (255/270/528)
Río Grande: Hillary 100.0% (2/0/2)
Sabana Grande: Hillary 68.0% (566/260/832)
Salinas: Hillary 77.2% (542/157/702)
San Germán: Hillary 66.0% (612/309/927)
San Juan: Hillary 50.2% (3823/3766/7609)
San Lorenzo: Bernie 100.0% (0/1/1)
San Sebastián: Hillary 100.0% (2/0/2)
Santa Isabel: Bernie 100.0% (0/1/1)
Toa Alta: Hillary 100.0% (2/0/2)
Toa Baja: Hillary 66.7% (4/2/6)
Trujillo Alto: Hillary 58.1% (1328/953/2286)
Utuado: Hillary 56.3% (382/294/679)
Vega Alta: Bernie 100.0% (0/1/1)
Vega Baja: Hillary 66.4% (1000/502/1506)
Vieques: Hillary 62.3% (132/79/212)
Villalba: Hillary 75.0% (412/130/549)
Yabucoa: Hillary 100.0% (2/0/2)
Yauco: Hillary 60.1% (291/191/484)

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

North Dakota

As the state of North Dakota reports its results by legislative district, would someone mind changing it from counties to districts (unless county results can be found)? Thanks! MB298 (talk) 01:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)