Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Instrument of Surrender, officially ending the Second World War.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Instrument of Surrender, officially ending the Second World War.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 09:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by Army Signal Corps photographer LT. Stephen E. Korpanty - uploaded by Adam Cuerden - nominated by TheFreeWorld 25 November 2020 09:49 (UTC) -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Support -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Question It's one of the most important events in history the past hundred years, but what can you tell us of the image quality? It seems quite unsharp and I'm wondering if it's been upscaled.--Peulle (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Peulle: Source is straight from the US Navy, so this is almost certainly the best available.Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Question But is it upscaled from the original print size? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: It's possibly at the higher end of dpi, but the question is kind of meaningless because there's no standard dpi.It's at a level that gets all extant detail. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- I assume there are existing prints? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- I mean, this is a scan of one. It's not an inverse of the negative. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- So what's the size of the print that was scanned? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- The Navy doesn't deign to say, alas. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- I see. Oh well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- The Navy doesn't deign to say, alas. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- So what's the size of the print that was scanned? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- I mean, this is a scan of one. It's not an inverse of the negative. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- I assume there are existing prints? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: It's possibly at the higher end of dpi, but the question is kind of meaningless because there's no standard dpi.It's at a level that gets all extant detail. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Peulle: Source is straight from the US Navy, so this is almost certainly the best available.Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support An immensely historic and important photo, whatever the technical shortcomings. Cmao20 (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20, ultimately. Still interested in the answer to my question, but it pales in importance to this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical
