Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helsinki July 2013-29a.jpg

File:Helsinki July 2013-29a.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2015 at 23:26:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Helsinki July 2013-29a.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helsinki July 2013-29a.jpg

•  Info Helsinki Luthean Cathedral (detail), Finland. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image quality is very good, but sorry Alvesgaspar, I think too much of the facde is in shadow as compared to the tower. Moreover the cropped building gives a for me incomplete composition. -- Slaunger (talk) 10:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Shame you did not get more of the building. How about cropping the bottom off, below the base of the triangle? The upper part is well side-lit. -- Colin (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry. No wow for me. I'd prefer something like this when showing the top part of the church. Not to mention that we already have 3 featured images about this cathedral, that all look very similar with this. And I'd also agree with Slaunger. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Info You are quite right @Colin: , thank you! New version below. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Alternative version. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lighting is not favorable; too much in shadow. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I think the light works for this one, the triangle at the bottom doesn't have much information anyway and the stuff on top shows good contrast. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I didn't notice the other FPs till now. This one still has merit as it seems to be from a different side and more detail. And I like the side lighting of the statues and dome. -- Colin (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Middle tower and columns are out of focus. Tigth crop above. --Mile (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 06:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)