Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 02.jpg

File:Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2015 at 20:14:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 02.jpg

•  Info All by me. -- ChristianFerrer 20:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
• Preferred FP gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
•  Support I have another not yet edited variant compositions for this place/subject in my RAW files, but I can neither resist nor wait. -- ChristianFerrer 20:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Really fine work!--Hubertl (talk) 20:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support  Awesome! --LivioAndronico talk 21:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very good. --Code (talk) 21:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Crop feels a little too tight. Is it possible to add more breathing space to the top and bottom of the photo without adding unwanted elements into the frame? --Fotoriety (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment same as Fotoriety. Would be excellent in portrait orientation with more space on top and bottom. In landscape orientation, the subject appears to try to break out of the frame while the sides don’t add value. Fixable? --Kreuzschnabel 06:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

• No -- ChristianFerrer 07:32, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support--XRay ^talk 09:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:44, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I wonder if a little more breathing space could be added with Photoshop? Easier for the sky than the water. -- Colin (talk) 11:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:32, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Info XRay, Archaeodontosaurus,Colin, Julian H., Kreuzschnabel, Code, Hubertl, LivioAndronico, Fotoriety, thanks all, I should not be very well up this morning because by checking the RAW file, I realized that I had cut a little up and down, I uploaded a new version with more space, now it's the maximum, I also crop a bit at right for a more off-centered image. Hope it's better. -- ChristianFerrer 12:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  • That's great, well done. -- Colin (talk) 18:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Bojars (talk) 12:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very good framing now, though I usually don’t like squared images too much. --Kreuzschnabel 12:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --DXR (talk) 13:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral because of the tight crop, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 16:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lovely shot, even a nice scale reference :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support ----Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 16:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers